4.5 Article

Obesity, overweight, and weight gain over adult life are main determinants of elevated hs-CRP in a cohort of Mediterranean women

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 64, 期 8, 页码 873-878

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.69

关键词

obesity; overweight; inflammation; women; cardiovascular prevention

资金

  1. MIUR [068937, 065985]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Objectives: Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), body weight modification, and rate of weight increase over 10 years were evaluated in relation to high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) to assess the association of cross-sectional or longitudinal estimates of obesity/overweight with levels of circulating CRP, a well established and standardized marker of low-grade inflammation, in relation to cardiovascular risk. Subjects: This study included a subgroup of 390 menopausal women participating in a large currently ongoing epidemiological study (Progetto Atena; N = 5062). Results: At the final visit, women in the third tertile of BMI, compared with those in the first tertile, showed the following odds ratio (OR) of having high hs-CRP values: III vs I tertile OR, 3.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.94-6.49, P<0.001, adjusted for age, and metabolic syndrome. Similar results were obtained when we evaluated women in the third tertile of WC, or those in the highest group of estimated weight increase, relative to their weight at age 20 years or in the group of highest rate of weight increase over 10 years of observation (weight at the final visit-weight at the baseline visit divided by time in months between visits). Conclusions: The independent relations between different markers of overweight/obesity and elevated hs-CRP consistently indicate that high (above 1.5 mg l(-1), median) hs-CRP is a major biochemical counterpart of cross-sectional or longitudinal estimates of increased adipose tissue mass. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2010) 64, 873-878; doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.69; published online 2 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据