4.6 Article

Cyclosporine metabolic side effects: association with the WNK4 system

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 1113-1120

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02517.x

关键词

Cyclosporine; familial hyperkalemia and hypertension (FHHt); hypercalciuria; Na-Cl cotransporter (NCC); WNK4 kinase

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Cyclosporine is used for treatment of transplanted patients and for immune-mediated diseases. Cyclosporine is known to cause a combination of metabolic side effects including hypertension, hyperkalemia, hypercalciuria and hypomagnesemia. These side effects except for hypomagnesemia are the cardinal features of familial hyperkalemia and hypertension (FHHt), also called pseudohypoaldosteronism type II (PHA II). FHHt is caused by mutations in the kinases WNK1 and WNK4 resulting in an increase in renal Na-Cl cotransporter (NCC) apical distribution and function. Therefore, we studied whether cyclosporine's metabolic side effects are mediated by WNK4 and NCC. Design Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were treated by cyclosporine 25 mg kg(-1) subcutaneously for 14 days. Blood pressure, blood chemistry values and kidney WNK4 protein were determined. In addition, mDCT cells were exposed to cyclosporine, and their WNK4 mRNA and protein content, and their NCC protein content and phosphorylation were determined. Results The rats developed an FHHt-like syndrome including hypertension, hyperkalemia and salt-sensitive hypercalciuria. A significant increase in their kidney WNK4 protein content (0 13 +/- 0 01 vs. 0 67 +/- 0 16 WNK4/GAPDH in controls, P = 0 0183) was found. In mDCT cells, cyclosporine caused a rise in WNK4 mRNA levels and also a threefold rise in WNK4 protein content. This rise was followed by a rise in NCC protein content and pSer71 phosphorylation. Conclusions These observations may explain in part the mechanism of cyclosporine-induced hypertension, hyperkalemia and hypercalciuria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据