4.5 Review

Exploring protein import pores of cellular organelles at the single molecule level using the planar lipid bilayer technique

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 9, 页码 721-730

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.04.012

关键词

Protein translocation; Channels; Pores; Planar lipid bilayer technique

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB431]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteins of living cells carry out their specialized functions within various subcellular membranes or aqueous spaces. Approximately half of all the proteins of a typical cell are transported into or across membranes. Targeting and transport to their correct subcellular destinations are essential steps in protein biosynthesis. In eukaryotic cells secretory proteins are transported into the endoplasmic reticulum before they are transported in vesicles to the plasma membrane. Virtually all proteins of the endosymbiotic organelles, chloroplasts and mitochondria, are synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes and posttranslationally imported. Genetic and biochemical techniques led to rather detailed knowledge on the subunit composition of the various protein transport complexes which carry out the membrane transport of the preproteins. Conclusive concepts on targeting and cytosolic transport of polypeptides emerged, while still few details on the molecular nature and mechanisms of the channel moieties of protein translocation complexes have been achieved. In this paper we will describe the history of how the individual subunits forming the channel pores of the chloroplast, mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum protein import machineries were identified and characterized by single channel electrophysiological techniques in planar bilayers. We will also highlight recent developments in the exploration of the molecular properties of protein translocating channels and the regulation of the diverse protein translocation systems using the planar bilayer technique. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据