4.5 Article

A proteomic analysis of aorta from spontaneously hypertensive rat:: RhoGDI alpha upregulation by angiotensin II via AT1 receptor

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 101-110

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2007.09.001

关键词

vascular remodeling; vascular smooth muscle cell; spontaneously hypertensive rat; RhoGDI alpha; proteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arteries undergo remodeling as a consequence of increased wall stress during hypertension. However, the molecular mechanisms of the vascular remodeling are largely unknown. Proteomics is a powerful tool to screen for differentially expressed proteins, but little effort was made on vascular disease research, especially on hypertension. In the present study, the differentially expressed proteins in aortas from 18-week-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and their normotensive counterpart, Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY), were examined by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE). We found 50 proteins to be differentially expressed, among which 27 were highly or only expressed in SHR and 23 in WKY. Using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOFMS) and online data search, nine proteins, including Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha (RhoGDI alpha), were identified with high confidence. Further, the upregulation of RhoGDI alpha was verified at both mRNA and protein level in SHR. In addition, when cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) from aortas of SHR and WKY were treated with angiotensin II (Ang II) and antagonist of angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) receptor, L158809, respectively, RhoGDIa was upregulated by Ang II and downregulated by L158809 in VSMCs of SHR. These results demonstrate that vascular remodeling results in significant alterations in the protein expression profile of the aorta during hypertension and suggest that the upregulation of RhoGDI alpha in hypertension is induced by Ang II via AT(1) receptor. (c) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据