4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Long-term outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a single institution experience

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 947-952

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.023

关键词

Pulmonary endarterectomy; Pulmonary hypertension; Survival; Surgical outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is the first treatment of choice with good short-term results. Only limited data are available concerning the tong-term outcome after PEA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tong-term survival and functional outcome after PEA with nearly 10 years experience. Method: In the period of December 1998 and December 2007 120 patients with CTEPH were referred to the St Antonius Hospital (Nieuwegein, The Netherlands) of whom 72 underwent PEA. The clinical data are collected retrospectively. Results: In-hospital mortality was (5/72) 6.9%. Since 2004 one patient died in the hospital (1/38, 2.9%). Two patients died during long-term follow-up with a median observation of 3 years. The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 93.1%, 91.2% and 88.7% respectively. Prior to surgery patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III (58) and IV (14) with a mean pulmonary vascular resistance of 572 +/- 313 dynes s cm(-5). The following data were compared before and after operation: mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) decreased from 42 +/- 11 to 22 +/- 7 mmHg (p = 0.0001), NT-pro BNP improved from 1527 1652 to 160 3 pg/ml (p = 0.0001), 6 min walk distance (6MWD) from 359 +/- 124 to 518 +/- 11 m (p = 0.0001), and almost all patients returned to functional class I or II (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Pulmonary endarterectomy for patients with CTEPH has shown a dramatic improvement of clinical status with excellent long-term survival. (C) 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据