4.4 Article

A comparison of the clinical determinants of health-related quality of life and subjective well-being in long-term breast cancer survivors

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 692-700

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01344.x

关键词

health-related quality of life; subjective well-being; overall quality of life; long-term breast cancer survivors

资金

  1. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (French National Cancer Association)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TESSIER P., LELORAIN S. & BONNAUD-ANTIGNAC A. (2012) European Journal of Cancer Care 21, 692-700 A comparison of the clinical determinants of health-related quality of life and subjective well-being in long-term breast cancer survivors Research concerning long-term breast cancer survivors (BCS) has primarily analysed their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, other dimensions of life considered important by patients might be affected by cancer treatments as well. The aim of this paper is thus to compare the clinical determinants of HRQoL and of overall quality of life as described by measures of subjective well-being (SWB) in long-term BCS. SWB represents a person's own evaluation of their overall situation. A total of 321 French BCS diagnosed 5 to 15 years ago participated in a cross-sectional mailed survey. Outcome measures were the physical and mental health scores of the 36-item Short-Form survey and measures of SWB (happiness, life satisfaction and the positive and negative affect scales). Multivariate regression analyses suggest that HRQoL and SWB measures provide different pictures of the experience of breast cancer. Treatment type has no impact on HRQoL but is correlated with all our SWB measures while time since diagnosis positively affects physical health but not SWB. We conclude that it could be fruitful to analyse SWB, alongside the traditional study of HRQoL, in order to enhance our understanding of the various long-lasting consequences of breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据