4.4 Article

Acute exercises induce disorders of the gastrointestinal integrity in a murine model

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 114, 期 3, 页码 609-617

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-013-2791-8

关键词

Small intestine; Exercise; Permeability; Apoptotic epithelial cells; Tissue conductance; Ion transport

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many endurance athletes complain about gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. It is assumed that exercise-induced shift of perfusion with consecutive hypoperfusion of the enteral vascular system leads to an increased GI permeability and tissue damage. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate permeability, apoptosis, electrogenic ion transport (Isc), and tissue conductance (Gt) of the small intestine in a murine exercise model. After spirometry, male Swiss CD-1 mice were subjected to an intensive treadmill exercise (80 % VO2max). Sedentary mice served as controls. The small intestine was removed at several time intervals post-exercise. Apoptotic cells were determined by the TUNEL method, while fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran permeation indicated intestinal permeability. The Gt and Isc measurements were carried out in a modified Ussing chamber. Apoptosis of epithelial cells increased continuously until 24 h post exercise (0.8 +/- A 0.42 versus 39.2 +/- A 26.0 %; p < 0.05). Compared with the control group the permeability increased 2 h after exercise (0.47 +/- A 0.07 versus 0.67 +/- A 0.14 FU/min; p < 0.05). Isc measurements of the ileum were augmented after 24 h (3.33 +/- A 0.56 versus 5.77 +/- A 1.16 mu Eq/h/cm(2); p < 0.05). At this time the Gt increased as well (28.8 +/- A 3.37 versus 32.5 +/- A 2.59 mS/cm(2); p < 0.05). In the murine exercise model there is evidence that after intense endurance exercise repair processes occur in small intestinal epithelial cells, which affect permeability, Gt, and Isc. The formation of lamellipodia to close the leaky tight junctions caused by apoptosis might be an underlying mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据