4.4 Review

Muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 10, 页码 2427-2437

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2086-x

关键词

Electrostimulation; Muscle strength; Delayed onset muscle soreness; Creatine kinase; Repeated bout effect; Isometric; Eccentric; Elbow flexors; Knee extensors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrical stimulation (ES) induces muscle damage that is characterised by histological alterations of muscle fibres and connective tissue, increases in circulating creatine kinase (CK) activity, decreases in muscle strength and development of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Muscle damage is induced not only by eccentric contractions with ES but also by isometric contractions evoked by ES. Muscle damage profile following 40 isometric contractions of the knee extensors is similar between pulsed current (75 Hz, 400 mu s) and alternating current (2.5 kHz delivered at 75 Hz, 400 mu s) ES for similar force output. When comparing maximal voluntary and ES-evoked (75 Hz, 200 mu s) 50 isometric contractions of the elbow flexors, ES results in greater decreases in maximal voluntary contraction strength, increases in plasma CK activity and DOMS. It appears that the magnitude of muscle damage induced by ES-evoked isometric contractions is comparable to that induced by maximal voluntary eccentric contractions, although the volume of affected muscles in ES is not as large as that of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. It seems likely that the muscle damage in ES is associated with high mechanical stress on the activated muscle fibres due to the specificity of motor unit recruitment (i.e., non-selective, synchronous and spatially fixed manner). The magnitude of muscle damage induced by ES is significantly reduced when the second ES bout is performed 2-4 weeks later. It is possible to attenuate the magnitude of muscle damage by pre-conditioning muscles, so that muscle damage should not limit the use of ES in training and rehabilitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据