4.4 Article

Cold-induced vasoconstriction at forearm and hand skin sites: the effect of age

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 109, 期 5, 页码 915-921

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1414-x

关键词

Thermoregulation; Aging; Glabrous skin

资金

  1. SenterNovem, The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During mild cold exposure, elderly are at risk of hypothermia. In humans, glabrous skin at the hands is well adapted as a heat exchanger. Evidence exists that elderly show equal vasoconstriction due to local cooling at the ventral forearm, yet no age effects on vasoconstriction at hand skin have been studied. Here, we tested the hypotheses that at hand sites (a) elderly show equal vasoconstriction due to local cooling and (b) elderly show reduced response to noradrenergic stimuli. Skin perfusion and mean arterial pressure were measured in 16 young adults (Y: 18-28 years) and 16 elderly (E: 68-78 years). To study the effect of local vasoconstriction mechanisms local sympathetic nerve terminals were blocked by bretylium (BR). Baseline local skin temperature was clamped at 33A degrees C. Next, local temperature was reduced to 24A degrees C. After 15 min of local cooling, noradrenalin (NA) was administered to study the effect of neural vasoconstriction mechanisms. No significant age effect was observed in vasoconstriction due to local cooling at BR sites. After NA, vasoconstriction at the forearm showed a significant age effect; however, no significant age effect was found at the hand sites. [Change in CVC (% from baseline): Forearm Y: -76 +/- A 3 vs. E: -60 +/- A 5 (P < 0.01), dorsal hand Y: -74 +/- A 4 vs. E: -72 +/- A 4 (n.s.), ventral hand Y: -80 +/- A 7 vs. E: -70 +/- A 11 (n.s.)]. In conclusion, in contrast to results from the ventral forearm, elderly did not show a blunted response to local cooling and noradrenalin at hand skin sites. This indicates that at hand skin the noradrenergic mechanism of vasoconstriction is maintained with age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据