4.4 Article

The effects of progressive dehydration on strength and power: is there a dose response?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 108, 期 4, 页码 701-707

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1288-y

关键词

Dehydration; Strength; Hypohydration; Power; Vertical jumping; EMG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effect of exercise- and heat-induced dehydration on strength, jump capacity and neuromuscular function. Twelve recreationally active males completed six resistance exercise bouts (baseline and after each 5 exposure sessions) in an increasing state of hypohydration obtained by repeated heat exposure and exercise sessions (5 periods of 20 min jogging at up to similar to 80% age predicted heart rate maximum at 48.5 +/- A 0.48A degrees C, relative humidity 50 +/- A 4%). Relative to starting values, body mass decreased 1.0 +/- A 0.5, 1.9 +/- A 0.7, 2.6 +/- A 0.8, 3.3 +/- A 0.9 and 3.9 +/- A 1.0% after exposure 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. However, plasma volume remained constant. No significant differences existed amongst trials in vertical jump height, electromyography data or isokinetic leg extension at a rate of 120A degrees A s(-1). Isometric leg extensions were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) after the first (1% body mass loss) and subsequent exposures in comparison to baseline. Isokinetic leg extensions at a rate of 30A degrees A s(-1) were significantly reduced after the third (2.6% body mass loss) and subsequent exposures compared with baseline. No dose response was identified in any of the tested variables yet a threshold was observed in isometric and isokinetic strength at 30A degrees A s(-1). In conclusion, dehydration caused by jogging in the heat had no effect on vertical jumping or isokinetic leg extensions at a rate of 120A degrees A s(-1). Alternatively, exercise-induced dehydration was detrimental to isometric and isokinetic leg extensions at a rate of 30A degrees A s(-1), suggesting the force-velocity relationship in hypohydration merits further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据