4.5 Article

Does HPA-axis activity mediate the relationship between obstetric complications and externalizing behavior problems? The TRAILS study

期刊

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 565-573

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-009-0014-y

关键词

Early adolescence; Externalizing behavior problems; Cortisol; Pre- and perinatal risk factors; General population

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization [GB-MW 940-38-011]
  2. ZonMW Brainpower [100-001-004]
  3. ZonMW Risk Behavior and Dependence [60-60600-97-118]
  4. ZonMW Culture and Health [261-98-710]
  5. Social Sciences Council medium-sized investment [GB-MaGW 480-01-006, GB-MaGW 457-03-018, GB-MaGW 452-04-314]
  6. NOW large-sized investment [175.010.2003.005]
  7. Sophia Foundation for Medical Research [301, 393]
  8. Dutch Ministry of Justice (WODC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine whether HPA-axis activity mediates the relationship between obstetric complications (OCs) and externalizing behavior problems, and to investigate whether this model is different for boys and girls. In a population-based cohort of 1,768 10- to 12-year-old early adolescents, we assessed the cortisol awakening response and evening cortisol levels. Externalizing behavior problems were assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist and the Youth Self-Report. OCs were retrospectively assessed in a parent interview. OCs significantly predicted externalizing behavior problems, but OCs did not predict HPA-axis activity. Thus, the mediation model was not supported. In addition to the relationship between HPA-axis activity and externalizing behavior problems, which is specific for girls, there is also a relationship between OCs and externalizing behavior problems. However, these two mechanisms are not related to each other indicating that HPA-axis activity is not a mediator in the relationship between OCs and externalizing behavior problems. Future research should focus on understanding the mechanism through which OCs cause externalizing behavior problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据