4.6 Article

Relationship between left atrial tissue structural remodelling detected using late gadolinium enhancement MRI and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with atrial fibrillation

期刊

EUROPACE
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 1725-1732

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut147

关键词

Left ventricular hypertrophy; MRI; Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Structural remodelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapeutic effectiveness of ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is related to cardiovascular comorbidities. We studied the relationship between left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left atrial tissue structural remodelling (LA-SRM), in patients presenting for AF ablation. We identified 404 AF patients who received a late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) prior to catheter ablation. Left ventricular hypertrophy was defined as LV mass index 116 g/m(2) in men and 104 g/m(2) in women. One hundred and twenty-two patients were classified as the LVH group and 282 as the non-LVH group. We stratified patients into four stages based on their degree of LA-SRM (minimal, 5 fibrosis; mild, 520; moderate, 2035; and extensive, 35). All patients underwent catheter ablation with pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall and septal debulking. The procedural outcome was monitored over a 1-year follow-up period. The mean LA-SRM was significantly higher in patients with LVH (19.4 13.2) than in non-LVH patients (15.3 9.8; P 0.01). Patients with LVH generally had extensive LA-SRM (moderate and extensive stages; 38.5 of LVH group) as compared with non-LVH patients (23.1 of non-LVH group; P 0.01). A Cox regression analysis showed that patients with LVH also had significantly higher AF recurrence rates than non-LVH patients (43.2 vs. 28; P 0.008) during the 1-year follow-up period post-ablation. Patients with LVH tend to have a significantly greater degree of LA-SRM, when compared with patients without LVH. Moreover, LA-SRM is a predictor for procedural success in patients undergoing AF ablation procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据