4.6 Article

Risk markers of late high-degree atrioventricular block in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after an acute myocardial infarction: a CARISMA substudy

期刊

EUROPACE
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1471-1477

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur165

关键词

CARISMA; Acute myocardial infarction; Atrioventricular block; Heart rate variability; Implantable loop recorder

资金

  1. Medtronic Inc.
  2. St. Jude Medical
  3. Boston Scientific
  4. Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
  5. Cambridge Heart Inc., Massachusetts, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims High-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with increased risk of mortality. Risk markers and predictors of HAVB occurring after AMI are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of risk markers derived from a series of non-invasive and invasive tests for the development of HAVB documented by an implantable loop recorder (ILR) in late convalescent phases of an AMI. Methods and results The study included 292 patients with AMI and subsequent left ventricular dysfunction without prior HAVB or implanted pacemaker. An ILR was implanted for continuous arrhythmia surveillance. Risk stratification testing was performed at inclusion and 6 weeks after AMI. The tests included echocardiography, electrocardiogram (ECG), 24 h Holter monitoring, and an invasive electrophysiological study. High-degree atrioventricular block was documented in 28 (10%) patients during a median follow-up of 2.0 (0.4-2.0) years. Heart rate variability (HRV) measures and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia occurring at the week 6 Holter monitoring were highly predictive of HAVB. Power law slope <-1.5 ms(2)/Hz was the most powerful HRV parameter (HR = 6.02 [2.08-17.41], P < 0.001). Conclusion Late HAVB development in post-AMI patients with left ventricular dysfunction can be predicted by risk stratification tests. Measures of HRV reflecting autonomic dysfunction revealed the highest predictive capabilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据