4.6 Article

Long-term outcome of the atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation for symptomatic refractory atrial fibrillation

期刊

EUROPACE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 412-418

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eun020

关键词

atrial fibrillation; atrioventricular node ablation; right ventricular pacing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims To investigate tong-term outcome and to determine predictors of development of heart failure (HF) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) node ablation and permanent right ventricular pacing because of symptomatic refractory atrial. fibrillation (AF). Background Atrioventricular node ablation and subsequent permanent pacing is a well-established therapy for patients with AF Long-term right ventricular pacing may induce HF. Methods and results In 121 (45 with previous HF) patients with drug refractory AF, AV node ablation and implantation of a pacemaker was performed. At baseline and after a mean follow-up of 4.3 +/- 3.3 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class for HF and left ventricular (W) and atrial diameters were assessed. During and at the end of follow-up, hospitalizations for HF, mortality, and quality of life were assessed using the SF-36 and an AVN-specific questionnaire. No significant changes in NYHA functional class (87 vs. 77% in NYHA I/II at baseline vs. end of follow-up) and LV end diastolic diameter (51 +/- 7 vs. 52 +/- 8 mm) were observed. Left ventricular end systolic diameter decreased (from 37 +/- 9 to 34 +/- 7 mm, P = 0.03) and fractional shortening improved (from 28 +/- 10 to 34 +/- 9, P = 0.02) in all patients and in patients with previous HF, but not in patients without previous HE Hospitalizations for HF occurred in 24 patients (20%), predominantly those with previous HE All-cause mortality occurred in 31 (26%) patients. At the end of follow-up, quality of life was comparable with the control group. Conclusion Long-term outcome of AV node ablation and permanent pacing is good. Atrioventricular node ablation remains a treatment option for AF

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据