4.6 Article

Quaternary heterostructured Ag-Bi2O2CO3/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55/Bi2MoO6 composite: Synthesis and enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 68-77

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.05.027

关键词

Heterostructured; Ag; Bi2O2CO3; Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55; Bi2MoO6; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fundation of China [21407059, 61308095]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M531286]
  3. Science Development Project of Jilin Province [20130522071JH, 20130102004JC]
  4. Science and Technology Research Project of the Department of Education of Jilin Province [2015220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a novel quaternary heterostructured Ag-Bi2O2CO3/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55/Bi2MoO6 composite was fabricated through a low-temperature solution-phase route. The XRD, SEM, EDX and XPS results indicated the as-prepared sample is a four-phase composite of Bi2O2CO3, Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55, Bi2MoO6, and Ag. The photocatalytic activities of the as-synthesized samples were evaluated towards the degradation of phenol red aqueous solution. The results showed that the as-synthesized Ag-Bi2O2CO3/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55/Bi2MoO6 photocatalysts displayed much higher photocatalytic activities in comparison with pure Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55, pure Bi2MoO6, and Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55/Bi2MoO6 composite. Among them, the 2.5% Ag-Bi2O2CO3/Bi3.64Mo0.36O6.55/Bi2MoO6 sample performed the best. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of the composite photocatalyst was attributed predominantly to the efficient separation of photoinduced electrons and holes. In addition, Ag nanoparticles were photodeposited on the surface of the composite to increase visible-light absorption via the surface plasmon resonance, which is also beneficial to the enhancement of photocatalytic performance. The possible photocatalytic mechanism of the quaternary heterostructure was also discussed in detail. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据