3.9 Article

Activity of the Calcium Channel Pore Cch1 Is Dependent on a Modulatory Region of the Subunit Mid1 in Cryptococcus neoformans

期刊

EUKARYOTIC CELL
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 142-150

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00130-12

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI054477, AI078848]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium (Ca2+)-mediated signaling events in fungal pathogens such as Cryptococcus neoformans are central to physiological processes, including those that mediate stress responses and promote virulence. The Cch1-Mid1 channel (CMC) represents the only high-affinity Ca2+ channel in the plasma membrane of fungal cells; consequently, cryptococci cannot survive in low-Ca2+ environments in the absence of CMC. Previous electrophysiological characterization revealed that Cch1, the predicted channel pore, and Mid1, a binding partner of Cch1, function as a store-operated Ca2+-selective channel gated by depletion of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ stores. Cryptococci lacking CMC did not survive ER stress, indicating its critical role in restoring Ca2+ homeostasis. Despite the requirement for Mid1 in promoting Ca2+ influx via Cch1, identification of the role of Mid1 remains elusive. Here we show that the C-terminal tail of Mid1 is a modulatory region that impinges on Cch1 channel activity directly and mediates the trafficking of Mid1 to the plasma membrane. This region consists of the last 24 residues of Mid1, and the functional expression of Mid1 in a human embryonic cell line (HEK293) and in C. neoformans is dependent on this domain. Substitutions of arginine (R619A) or cysteine (C621A) in the modulatory region failed to target Mid1 to the plasma membrane and prevented CMC activity. Interestingly, loss of a predicted protein kinase C (PKC)-phosphorylated serine residue (S605A) had no effect on Mid1 trafficking but did alter the kinetics of Cch1 channel activity. Thus, establishment of Ca2+ homeostasis in C. neoformans is dependent on a modulatory domain of Mid1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据