4.6 Article

Uncertainty of excess density and settling velocity of mud flocs derived from in situ measurements

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 426-436

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.01.007

关键词

settling velocity; floc density; error propagation; floes; North Sea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct or indirect measurements of excess density and settling velocity are inherently associated with uncertainties (errors) due to a lack of accuracy of the measuring instruments, inadequate precision of the observations, and the statistical nature of the variables (floc size, primary particle size and primary particle density). When using observations, some understanding of the uncertainties is needed. Based on the theory of error propagation, we have estimated the error of the excess density and the settling velocity of mud floes using the measurement data of OBS, SPM filtration, LISST 100C, CTD and Sedigraph. The measurements were carried out between 2003 and 2005 in the southern North Sea in the course of eight tidal cycles. The excess density was calculated based on fractal description of mud floes and using floc and water density data. The water density was derived from CTD measurements and the floc density was calculated using SPM concentration, particle volume concentration, and water and primary particle densities. The settling velocities of floes were calculated on the basis of their fractal structure following Winterwerp, J. [1998. A simple model for turbulence induced flocculation of cohesive sediments. Journal of Hydraulic Research 36, 309-326]. The results show that the relative standard deviations for excess density, fractal dimension and settling velocity are about 10%, 2.5% and 100%, respectively. These uncertainties should be regarded as lower limits of the real error because the errors due to inaccuracies of the OBS, LISST and Sedigraph have been excluded, as they are unknown. From the results it was found that the statistical error of excess density was dominated by uncertainties of SPM concentration and primary particle density, and for fall velocity by uncertainties of primary particle and floc sizes, respectively. These statistical uncertainties will always be high when dealing with natural floes or particles and cannot be reduced by increasing the accuracy of the instruments. They should therefore be taken into account when modelling cohesive sediment transport, either by using the calculated standard deviations for settling velocity, or by introducing a floc size (settling velocity) distribution in the transport model. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据