4.5 Article

The Facilitative Role of Kosteletzkya pentacarpos in Transitioning Coastal Agricultural Land to Wetland During Sea Level Rise

期刊

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 35-44

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-014-9795-4

关键词

Sea level rise; Coastal agriculture and salinization; Kosteletzkya pentacarpos; Spartina patens; Nurse plant; Wetland

资金

  1. University of Delaware Sea Grant
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sea Grant College [NA10OAR4170084]
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rising sea level is increasing soil salinity and flooding frequency, directly impacting low-lying coastal farmlands. In response to reduced production of traditional crops, dikes may be built which will prevent inland migration of wetlands. Seashore mallow, Kosteletzkya pentacarpos, is being developed as an alternative crop for such areas. Eventually, when the crop can no longer be harvested because of flooding, we hypothesize that seashore mallow will facilitate the establishment of desirable wetland species by acting as a nurse crop through this transitional period. Four treatments were planted in flood-irrigated plots at an upland field site adjacent to a salt marsh. The control, Spartina patens, K. pentacarpos, and combined treatments were laid out in a complete randomized block design with replication. These were sampled for species percent vegetative cover, morphological traits, above-ground biomass, and leaf litter. The presence of seashore mallow enhanced S. patens and Baccharis halimifolia recruitment and did not negatively impact growth of planted S. patens. Communities established around K. pentacarpos were both productive and diverse, and leaf litter was increased by K. pentacarpos. Our findings support the use of K. pentacarpos as a low-cost nurse crop in salinized agro-ecosystems. Such a strategy would prolong agricultural function and minimize loss of ecological services by allowing gradual inland wetland migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据