4.4 Article

Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy

期刊

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 445-451

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.05.012

关键词

Cluster analysis; Neuropsychological tests; Magnetic resonance imaging; Seizures; Cognition; Cortical thickness

资金

  1. [2RO1 NINDS 37738]
  2. [MO1 RR 03186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Previous research characterized three cognitive phenotypes ill temporal lobe epilepsy, each associated with a different profile of clinical seizure and demographic characteristics, total cerebral (gray, white, cerebrospinal fluid) and hippocampal Volumes, and prospective cognitive trajectories. The objective of this investigation was to characterize in detail the specific neuroanatomical abnormalities associated with each cognitive phenotype. Methods: High-resolution MRI scans of healthy controls (n = 53) and patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (n = 55), grouped by cognitive phenotype (minimally impaired; memory impaired; memory, executive function, and speed impaired), were examined with respect to patterns of gray matter thickness through as well as volumes of subcortical Structures, corpus callosum, and regions of the out the cortical mantle, cerebellum. Results: Increasing abnormalities in temporal and extratemporal cortical thickness, Volumes Of subcortical structures (hippocampus, thalamus, basal ganglia), all regions of the corpus callosum, and bilateral cerebellar gray matter distinguish the cognitive phenotypes in a generally stepwise fashion. The most intact anatomy is observed in the minimally impaired epilepsy group and the most abnormal anatomy is evident in the epilepsy group with impairments in memory, executive function, and speed. Conclusion: Empirically derived cognitive phenotypes are associated with the presence, severity, and distribution of anatomic abnormalities in widely distributed cortical, subcortical, callosal, and cerebellar networks. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据