4.5 Article

Vertical distribution of pharmaceuticals in lake sediments-citalopram as potential chemomarker

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1738-1744

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.1901

关键词

Pharmaceutical; Sediment; Citalopram; Coprostanol; Effluent

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [109823]
  2. Finnish Graduate School in Environmental Science and Technology
  3. Maa- ja vesitekniikan tuki ry
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [109823, 109823] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of pharmaceuticals has increased enormously over the last few decades and serious concerns about their environmental fate and effects have arisen. Thus far, there is little knowledge about the historical pollution of the environment by pharmaceuticals. In the present study, sediment columns from three lake sites adjacent to wastewater treatment plants were collected, further divided in 2- or 2.5-cm slices, and analyzed for 15 pharmaceuticals by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In addition, sediment columns were historically interpreted by analyzing fecal sterols (coprostanol and cholesterol) as well as organic material and organic carbon. Several pharmaceuticals were detected in sediments, the most abundant being citalopram, bisoprolol, and propranolol. At site A, pharmaceuticals prevailed only in the uppermost 15?cm, whereas at site B they existed in the whole sediment column (030?cm). Pharmaceuticals were not found in site C sediments. Based on the sterol analyses, municipal wastewater contamination at sites A, B, and C was found in the uppermost 15, 30, and 20?cm, respectively. For the first time, contamination of sediments by pharmaceuticals was demonstrated below the subsurface (up to a depth of 30?cm). When considering the consumption and the observed concentration profiles of pharmaceuticals, a clear increasing trend of citalopram toward the surface was evident at site A. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012; 31: 17381744. (c) 2012 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据