4.5 Article

ENVIRONMENTAL FRACTIONATION OF PCBS AND PBDES DURING PARTICLE TRANSPORT AS RECORDED BY SEDIMENTS IN COASTAL WATERS

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1522-1532

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.542

关键词

Polychlorinated biphenyls; Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Log K-OW; Sediments; Strait of Georgia

资金

  1. Environment Canada under Georgia Basin Action Plan
  2. Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  3. Metro Vancouver

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Strait of Georgia (British Columbia, Canada) is a hydrologically complex inland sea with a rich abundance and diversity of species of aquatic life. Marine sediments, as both a sink for hydrophobic contaminants and a potential source for aquatic food webs, were collected from 41 sites throughout the 6,900-km(2) Strait of Georgia. The congener-specific concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), including BDE-209, were measured. Urban harbors represented hotspots for both PCBs and PBDEs, whereas PBDEs were also found at high concentrations near municipal outfalls. Patterns of PCB distribution were consistent with historical point source emissions in urban areas and environmental distillation toward lighter profiles in remote sites over time. The single congener BDE-209 dominated the PBDEs, accounting for 52% of the average total concentration. However, nonurban deep-water sediment PBDE profiles were both heavier and had higher concentration-weighted average log K-OW (octanol water partition coefficient) values compared to shallow samples (percent BDE-209 of total PBDE, 66 versus 32%; log K-OW, 9.5 versus 8.2, respectively). Collectively, our results suggest that although source signals largely explain PCB and PBDE hotspots in the Strait of Georgia, the combination of physicochemical properties and environmental processes drive divergent compositional fates for the PCBs and the heavier PBDEs in the sediments of the Strait of Georgia. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011;30:1522-1532. (C) 2011 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据