4.7 Article

Exposure to Benzidine Caused Apoptosis and Malformation of Telencephalon Region in Zebrafish

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 1428-1436

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/tox.21873

关键词

apoptosis; benzidine; brain; zebrafish

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC-101-2311-B-040-001, NSC 96-2317-B-241-002]
  2. National Science Council (NSC) [NSC-99-2321-B-001-027]
  3. Zebrafish Core in Academia Sinica (ZCAS)
  4. Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology (ICOB) [100-2321-B-400-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to benzidine has been known to induce human cancers, particularly bladder carcinomas. In this study, the zebrafish model was used to investigate the developmental toxicity of benzidine. Embryos at 6 h postfertilization (hpf) that were exposed to benzidine exhibited embryonic death in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Benzidine induced malformations in zebrafish, such as small brain development, shorter axes, and a slight pericardial edema. High concentrations (50, 100, and 200 mu M) of benzidine triggered widespread apoptosis in the brain and dorsal neurons, as evidenced by acridine orange and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) assays. Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis also showed that benzidine treatment affected p53, bax, and noxa expression. Decreases in specific brain markers, such as emx1 in the telencephalon, ngn1 in differentiated neurons, and otx2 in the midbrain, were observed in benzidine-treated embryos at 24 hpf. Conversely, no overt changes to pax2.1 expression in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary were found. Moreover, the use of Tg(HuC:GFP) zebrafish showed that benzidine caused a malformation of the telencephalon region. Our findings show that benzidine exposure triggers widespread apoptosis in the zebrafish brain and dorsal neurons, resulting in the development of an abnormal telencephalon. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 29: 1428-1436, 2014.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据