4.4 Article

Long-term operation of a novel pilot-scale six tanks alternately operating activated sludge process in treating domestic wastewater

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 15, 页码 1874-1885

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2014.885068

关键词

nutrient removal; FISH analysis; NOB inhibition; partial nitrification

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology program for water pollution control and treatment [2012ZX07101-005]
  2. Key Grant Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51078074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of a new pilot-scale six tanks activated sludge process has been evaluated for 303d, receiving real domestic wastewater with a flow rate of 15-24.4L/h. Partial nitrification via nitrite and microbial community structure were investigated in this system. The result shows that the nitrite accumulation rate was achieved successfully over 94% in the last aerobic compartment through a combination of short hydraulic retention time and low dissolved oxygen (DO) level. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was used to correlate ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) numbers with nutrient removal via nitrite. It was shown that in response to complete and partial nitrification modes, the numbers of AOB population were 7.7x10(7) cells/g mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and 5.31x10(8) cells/g MLSS, respectively. The morphology of the sludge indicated that there is a small rod-shaped and spherical cluster which was mainly dominantly bacterial according to scanning electron microscope. Higher pollutant removal efficiencies of 86.2%, 98%, and 96.1%, for total nitrogen, , and total phosphorus, respectively, were achieved by a long-term operation of the six tanks activated sludge process at a low DO concentration and low chemical oxygen demand to nitrogen ratio which were approximately equal to the complete nitrification-denitrification with the addition of an external carbon source at a concentration of 1.5-2.5mg/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据