4.4 Article

Helicobacter pylori seropositivity and pregnancy-related diseases: a prospective cohort study

期刊

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 41-47

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2015.02.004

关键词

Helicobacter pylori; Infection; Pregnancy outcome; Gestational diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RFPS-2007-4-638281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and extragastric disease is well established. This study prospectively investigated whether maternal H. pylori seropositivity, detected during the first half of pregnancy, could be associated with the development of the major pregnancy-related pathological conditions during the late second or third trimester in a general population. Our hypothesis was that H. pylori infection might negatively influence pregnancy development and outcome. A total of 2820 consecutive pregnant women were recruited before 20 weeks' gestation, from October 2008 to August 2010, and blood samples were collected from each subject. IgG antibodies against H. pylori were assayed in maternal serum by a commercial immunoassay. Logistic regression analyses were per-formed to assess any association between H. pylori seropositivity and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was the most common maternal complication (5.7%) and the only pregnancy-related disorder with a significantly higher rate of H. pylori-positive women (41.3%) compared with subjects who did not develop the disease (27.7%; P < 0.001; OR = 1.829, 95% CI = 1.320-2.533). The difference observed remained statistically significant after adjusting for potential confounding variables. The presence of antibodies against H. pylori antigens in maternal serum was independently associated with the development of GDM. These findings suggest that H. pylori eradication might play a role in the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据