4.8 Article

Influence of Phosphate and Silica on U(VI) Precipitation from Acidic and Neutralized Wastewaters

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 11, 页码 6097-6106

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4056559

关键词

-

资金

  1. Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy [SBR-DE-SC0006781]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uranium speciation and physical chemical characteristics were studied in solids precipitated from synthetic acidic to circumneutral wastewaters in the presence and absence of dissolved silica and phosphate to examine thermodynamic and kinetic controls on phase formation. Composition of synthetic wastewater was based on disposal sites 216-U-8 and 216-U-12 Cribs at the Hanford site (WA, USA). In the absence of dissolved silica or phosphate, crystalline or amorphous uranyl oxide hydrates, either compreignacite or meta-schoepite, precipitated at pH 5 or 7 after 30 d of reaction, in agreement with thermodynamic calculations. In the presence of 1 mM dissolved silica representative of groundwater concentrations, amorphous phases dominated by compreignacite precipitated rapidly at pH 5 or 7 as a metastable phase and formation of poorly crystalline boltwoodite, the thermodynamically stable uranyl silicate phase, was slow. In the presence of phosphate (3 mM), meta-ankoleite initially precipitated as the primary phase at pH 3, 5, or 7 regardless of the presence of 1 mM dissolved silica. Analysis of precipitates by U L-III-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) indicated that autunite-type sheets of meta-ankoleite transformed to phosphuranylite-type sheets after 30 d of reaction, probably due to Ca substitution in the structure. Low solubility of uranyl phosphate phases limits dissolved U(VI) concentrations but differences in particle size, crystallinity, and precipitate composition vary with pH and base cation concentration, which will influence the thermodynamic and kinetic stability of these phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据