4.8 Article

A Flux-Gradient System for Simultaneous Measurement of the CH4, CO2, and H2O. Fluxes at a Lake-Air Interface

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 24, 页码 14490-14498

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es5033713

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41475141, 41275024]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK2011830]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [PCSIRT]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PAPD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inland lakes play important roles in water and greenhouse gas cycling in the environment. This study aims to test the performance of a flux-gradient system for simultaneous measurement of the fluxes of water vapor, CO2, and CH4 at a lakeair interface. The concentration gradients over the water surface were measured with an analyzer based on the wavelength-scanned cavity ring-down spectroscopy technology, and the eddy diffusivity was measured with a sonic anemometer. Results of a zero-gradient test indicate a flux measurement precision of 4.8 W m(2) for water vapor, 0.010 mg m(-2) s(-1) for CO2, and 0.029 mu g m(-2) s(-1) for CH4. During the 620 day measurement period, 97%, 69%, and 67% of H2O, CO2, and CH4 hourly fluxes were higher in magnitude than the measurement precision, which confirms that the flux-gradient system had adequate precision for the measurement of the lakeair exchanges. This study illustrates four strengths of the flux-gradient method: (1) the ability to simultaneously measure the flux of H2O, CO2, and CH4; (2) negligibly small density corrections; (3) the ability to resolve small CH4 gradient and flux; and (4) continuous and noninvasive operation. The annual mean CH4 flux (1.8 g CH4 m(-2) year(-1)) at this hypereutrophic lake was close to the median value for inland lakes in the world (1.6 g CH4 m(-2) year(-1)). The system has adequate precision for CH4 flux for broad applications but requires further improvement to resolve small CO2 flux in many lakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据