4.8 Article

Global Liver Proteome Analysis Using iTRAQ Labeling Quantitative Proteomic Technology to Reveal Biomarkers in Mice Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 21, 页码 12170-12177

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es3027715

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20907004, 20837004]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT12LAB09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteomic analysis allows detection of changes of proteins expression in organisms exposed to environmental pollutants, leading to the discovery of biomarkers of exposure and understanding of the action mechanism of toxicity. In the present study, we applied iTRAQ labeling quantitative proteomic technology for global characterization of the liver proteome in mice exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). This successfully identified and quantified 1038 unique proteins. Seventy-one proteins showed a significant expression change in the treated groups (1.0, 2.5, 5.0 mg/kg of body weight) compared with the control group, and 16 proteins displayed strong dose dependent changes. Gene ontology analysis showed that these differential proteins were significantly enriched and stimulus. We detected significantly increased expression levels of enzymes regulating mainly involved in lipid metabolism, transport, biosynthetic processes, and response to peroxisomal beta-oxidation-including long chain acyl-CoA synthetase, acyl-CoA oxidase 1, bifunctional enzyme, and 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase A. PFOS also significantly induced cytochrome P450s and glutathione S-transferases that are responsible for the metabolism of xenobiotic compounds. The expressions of several proteins with important biological functions-such as cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase, aldehyde dehydrogenase, and apolipoprotein A-I, also correlated with PFOS exposure. Together, the present results provide insight into the molecular mechanism and biomarkers for PFOS-induced effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据