4.8 Article

Mercury Methylation Rates for Geochemically Relevant HgII Species in Sediments

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 21, 页码 11653-11659

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es3015327

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2008-4363]
  2. Umea Marine Sciences Centre, Umea University
  3. Kempe Foundation
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monomethylmercury (MeHg) in fish from freshwater, estuarine, and marine environments is a major global environmental issue. Mercury levels in biota are mainly controlled by the methylation of inorganic mercuric mercury (Hg-II) to MeHg in water, sediments, and soils. There is, however, a knowledge gap concerning the mechanisms and rates of methylation of specific geochemical Hg-II species. Such information is crucial for a better understanding of variations in MeHg concentrations among ecosystems and, in particular, for predicting the outcome of currently proposed measures to mitigate mercury emissions and reduce MeHg concentrations in fish. To fill this knowledge gap we propose an experimental approach using Hg-II isotope tracers, with defined and geochemically important adsorbed and solid Hg-II forms in sediments, to study MeHg formation. We report Hg-II methylation rate constants, k(m), in estuarine sediments which span over 2 orders of magnitude depending on chemical form of added tracer: metacinnabar (beta-(HgS)-Hg-201(s)) < cinnabar (alpha-(HgS)-Hg-199(s)) < Hg-II reacted with mackinawite ( FeS-Hg-202(II)) < Hg-II bonded to natural organic matter (NOM-Hg-196(II)) < a typical aqueous tracer (Hg-198(NO3)(2)(aq)). We conclude that a combination of thermodynamic and kinetic effects of Hg-II solid-phase dissolution and surface desorption control the Hg-II methylation rate in sediments and cause the large observed differences in k(m)-values. The selection of relevant solid-phase and surface-adsorbed Hg-II tracers will therefore be crucial to achieving biogeochemically accurate estimates of ambient Hg-II methylation rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据