4.8 Article

Degradation of Pentachlorophenol and 2,4-Dichlorophenol by Sequential Visible-light Driven Photocatalysis and Laccase Catalysis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 23, 页码 9117-9122

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es1025432

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB429003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40701166]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) [2006AA06Z323]
  4. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation, China [121077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorophenols (CPs) can be degraded by visible-light driven photocatalysis or laccase catalysis. However, previous and present studies have shown that neither of the two methods was efficient when being used individually. Low degradation rates were observed for the degradation of pentachlorophenol (PCP) by laccase-catalysis and that of 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) by photocatalysis. To remove CPs more completely, a sequential photolaccase catalytic system was designed to degrade PCP and 2,4-DCP mixture in water at the optimal pH value. The results showed that photocatalysis prior to laccase-catalysis (PPL) is a better approach than laccase-catalysis prior to photocatalysis (LPP), eliminating Cps more efficiently and generating lower toxic products. The identified intermediate products consisted of adipic acid, hexanediol, glycol, propylene glycol, hydroquinol, and phthalandione. Based on the products identified, the sequential degradation process was proposed, including the interlace reactions involving quinoid oxidation, reductive dechlorination, and no-enzyme polymerization. Upon reaction optimization, a piston flow reactor (PFR) was designed to treat the continuous feeding of simulated wastewater containing PCP and 2,4-DCP. After a 128 h period of treatment, 87.4-99.5% total concentration of CPs were removed (PPL removed 99.7% PCP and 99.2% 2,4-DCP; LPP removed 95.9% PCP and 78.9% 2,4-DCP).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据