4.8 Article

Influence of Magnetite Stoichiometry on FeII Uptake and Nitrobenzene Reduction

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 3675-3680

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es803613a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation NIRT [EAR-0506679]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetite (Fe3O4) is a common biomineralization product of microbial iron respiration and is often found in subsurface anoxic environments, such as groundwater aquifers where aqueous Fe-II is present. We investigated the reaction between aqueous Fe-II and magnetite using the isotopic selectivity of Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy and revisited the reduction of nitrobenzene by magnetite. Similar to our previous findings with Fe3+ oxides, we did not observe the formation of a stable sorbed Fe-II species; instead, we observed oxidation of the Fe-II to a partially oxidized magnetite phase. Oxidation of Fe-II was accompanied by reduction of the octahedral Fe3+ atoms in the underlying magnetite to octahedral Fe2+ atoms. The lack of a stable, sorbed Fe-II species on magnetite prompted us to re-evaluate what is controlling the extent of Fe-II uptake on magnetite, as well as contaminant reduction in the presence of magnetite and Fe-II. Uptake of Fe-II by magnetite appears to be limited by the stoichiometry of the magnetite particles, rather than the surface area of the particles. More oxidized (or less stoichiometric) magnetite particles take up more Fe-II, with the formation of stoichiometric magnetite (Fe2+/Fe3+ = 0.5) limiting the extent of Fe-II uptake. We also show that stoichiometric magnetite, in the absence of aqueous Fe-II, can rapidly reduce nitrobenzene. Based on these results, we speculate that contaminant reduction that was previously attributed to Fe-II sorbed on magnetite is due to a process similar to negative (n) doping of a solid, which increases the stoichiometry of the magnetite and alters the bulk redox properties of the particle to make reduction more favorable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据