4.8 Article

A New Real-Time Method for Determining Particles' Sphericity and Density: Application to Secondary Organic Aerosol Formed by Ozonolysis of α-Pinene

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 21, 页码 8033-8038

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es8013562

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. Chemical Sciences Division
  3. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. PNNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
  5. U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute [DE-AC06-76RL0 1830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle volumes are most often obtained by measuring particle mobility size distributions and assuming that the particles are spherical. Particle volumes are then converted to mass loads by using particle densities that are commonly estimated from measured mobility and vacuum aerodynamic diameters, assuming that the particles are spherical. For aspherical particles, these assumptions can introduce significant errors. We present in this work a new method that can be applied to any particle system to determine in real time whether the particles are spherical or not. We use oursecond-generation single particle mass spectrometer (SPLAT II) to measure with extremely high precision the vacuum aerodynamic size distributions of particles that are classified by differential mobility analyzer and demonstrate that the line shape of these vacuum aerodynamic size distributions provide a way to unambiguously distinguish between spherical and aspherical particles. Moreover, the very same experimental system is used to obtain the size, density, composition, and dynamic shape factors of individual particles. We present an application of this method to secondary organic aerosols that are formed as a result of ozonolysis of alpha-pinene in the presence and absence of an OH scavenger and find these particles to be spherical with densities of 1.198 +/- 0.004 and 1.213 +/- 0.003 g cm(-3), respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据