4.7 Article

Differences in urine cadmium associations with kidney outcomes based on serum creatinine and cystatin C

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 111, 期 8, 页码 1236-1242

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.07.012

关键词

Cadmium; Cystatin C; Kidney function; Serum creatinine; Urine creatinine

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [2 ES007198]
  2. Korea Research Foundation [2000-00545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cadmium is a well-known nephrotoxicant; chronic exposure increases risk for chronic kidney disease. Recently, however, associations between urine cadmium and higher creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been reported. Analyses utilizing alternate biomarkers of kidney function allow evaluation of potential mechanisms for these observations. We compared associations of urine cadmium with kidney function measures based on serum cystatin C to those with serum creatinine in 712 lead workers. Mean (standard deviation) molybdenum-corrected urine cadmium, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) eGFR and multi-variable cystatin C eGFR were 1.02 (0.65) mu g/g creatinine, and 97.4 (19.2) and 112.0 (17.7) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. The eGFR measures were moderately correlated (r(s)=0.5: p < 0.001). After adjustment, In (urine cadmium) was not associated with serum cystatin-C-based measures. However, higher In (urine cadmium) was associated with higher creatinine-based eGFRs including the MDRD and an equation incorporating serum cystatin C and creatinine (beta-coefficient=4.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 95% confidence interval=1.6, 6.6). Urine creatinine was associated with serum creatinine-based but not cystatin-C-based eGFRs. These results support a biomarker-specific, rather than a kidney function, effect underlying the associations observed between higher urine cadmium and creatinine-based kidney function measures. Given the routine use of serum and urine creatinine in kidney and biomarker research, additional research to elucidate the mechanism(s) for these associations is essential. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据