4.7 Article

Enabling collaborative decision-making in watershed management using cloud-computing services

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 93-97

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.008

关键词

Watershed management; Environmental decision-making; Total maximum daily load; Cloud computing

资金

  1. NASA Grant from Southwest Research Institute(R) (SwRI) [NNX09AR63G]
  2. NASA [107884, NNX09AR63G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Watershed management, in its very nature, represents a participatory process, requiring horizontal and vertical collaborations among multiple institutions and stakeholders. For watershed-scale management to be effective, a social-learning infrastructure needs to be in place to allow for the integration of diverse knowledge and interests related to watershed protection and restoration. Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) have long been used to support co-learning processes during watershed management. However, implementation and maintenance of EDSS in house often pose a significant burden to local watershed partnerships because of budgetary and technological constraints. Recent advances in service-oriented computing can help shift away the technical burden of EDSS implementation to service providers and enable watershed partnerships to focus primarily on decision-making activities. In this paper, I describe the migration of an EDSS module from the traditional client-server-based architecture to a client of cloud-computing services. Google Drive, which is behind the new version of the EDSS module, provides a number of basic visual analytics features that can be used to increase the collaborative decision-making experience while drastically reducing the cost of small-scale EDSS. More sophisticated EDSS may be implemented by leveraging the strengths of both client-server architectures and cloud-computing services. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据