4.7 Article

GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 23, 期 10-11, 页码 1300-1311

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.03.005

关键词

river hydrodynamic modeling; terrain models; geographic information systems (GIS); flood inundation mapping; river cross-sections; interpolation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two- and three-dimensional (2D/3D) hydrodynamic models require the geometric description of river bathymetry and its surrounding area as a continuous surface. These surface representations of river systems are also required in mapping flood inundation extents. Creating surface representations of river systems is a challenging task because of issues associated with interpolating river bathymetry, and then integrating this bathymetry with surrounding topography. The objectives of this paper are to highlight key issues associated with creating an integrated river terrain, and propose GIS techniques to overcome these issues. The following techniques are presented in this paper: mapping and analyzing river channel data in a channel fitted coordinate system; interpolation of river cross-sections to create a 3D mesh for main channel; and integration of interpolated 3D mesh with surrounding topography. These techniques are applied and cross-validated by using datasets from Brazos River in Texas, Kootenai River in Montana, and Strouds Creek in North Carolina. Creation of a 3D mesh for the main channel using a channel-fitted coordinate system and subsequent integration with surrounding topography produces a coherent river terrain model, which can be used for 2D/3D hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Although techniques presented in this paper produce better results compared to existing GIS methods, the linear approach has some limitations which can be overcome by accounting for channel meanders, sinuosity and thalweg location. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据