4.5 Article

Assessing Critical Source Areas in Watersheds for Conservation Buffer Planning and Riparian Restoration

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 968-980

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9380-y

关键词

Conservation buffers; Variable area source hydrology; Geographic information systems; Hydrologically sensitive areas; Critical source areas; Topographic index

资金

  1. New Jersey Water Resources Research Institute at Rutgers University, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
  2. STAR (Science To Achieve Results) grant through the Collaborative Science and Technology Network for Sustainability program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A science-based geographic information system (GIS) approach is presented to target critical source areas in watersheds for conservation buffer placement. Critical source areas are the intersection of hydrologically sensitive areas and pollutant source areas in watersheds. Hydrologically sensitive areas are areas that actively generate runoff in the watershed and are derived using a modified topographic index approach based on variable source area hydrology. Pollutant source areas are the areas in watersheds that are actively and intensively used for such activities as agricultural production. The method is applied to the Neshanic River watershed in Hunterdon County, New Jersey. The capacity of the topographic index in predicting the spatial pattern of runoff generation and the runoff contribution to stream flow in the watershed is evaluated. A simple cost-effectiveness assessment is conducted to compare the conservation buffer placement scenario based on this GIS method to conventional riparian buffer scenarios for placing conservation buffers in agricultural lands in the watershed. The results show that the topographic index reasonably predicts the runoff generation in the watershed. The GIS-based conservation buffer scenario appears to be more cost-effective than the conventional riparian buffer scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据