4.4 Article

Embryonic Developmental Rates of Northern Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae): Implications for Climate Change and Habitat Management

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 1643-1651

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/EN09356

关键词

Orthoptera; Acrididae; insect life cycles; voltinism; global warming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate models of temperature-dependent embryonic developmental rates are important to assess the effects of a changing climate on insect life cycles and to suggest methods of population management by habitat manipulation. Embryonic development determines the life cycle of many species of grasshoppers, which, in cold climates, spend two winters in the egg stage. Increasing temperatures associated with climate change in the subarctic could potentiate a switch to a univoltine life cycle. However, egg hatch could be delayed by maintaining a closed vegetative canopy, which would lower soil temperatures by shading the soil surface. Prediapause and postdiapause embryonic developmental rates were measured in the laboratory over a wide range of temperatures for Melanoplus borealis Fieber and Melanoplus sanguinipes F. (Orthoptera: Acrididae) A model was fit to the data and used to predict dates of egg hatch in the spring and prediapause development in the fall under different temperature regimens. Actual soil temperatures were recorded at several locations over 5 yr. To simulate climate warming, 2, 3, or 4 degrees C was added to each hourly recorded temperature. Results suggest that a 2, 3, or 4 degrees C increase in soil temperatures will result in eggs hatching approximate to 3, 5, or 7 d earlier, respectively. An increase of 3 degrees C would be required to advance prediapause development enough to allow for a portion of the population to be univoltine in warmer years. To simulate shading, 2 and 4 degrees C were subtracted from observed temperatures. A 4 degrees C decrease in temperatures could potentially delay hatch by 8 d.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据