4.2 Article

Size-dependent ontogenetic diet shifts to piscivory documented from stable isotope analyses in an introduced population of largemouth bass

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES
卷 93, 期 2, 页码 255-266

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-011-9911-2

关键词

Largemouth bass; Ontogenetic diet shifts; Piscivory; Stable isotope; Introduced fish; Length frequency analysis

资金

  1. JSPS [20570013, 20570014]
  2. Tohoku Regional Environmental Office, Ministry of the Environment
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20570014, 20570013] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Piscivorous largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) have been introduced in several regions outside of their native range in North America, resulting in significant disturbance to native fish communities. This species exhibits an ontogenetic diet shift from zooplanktivory to piscivory as juveniles. An early switch to piscivory allows 0+ bass to increase their growth rate prior to winter, resulting in reduced mortality. However, little is known about the dietary switch at the population level during the first year. We used carbon stable isotope analyses to examine the diets of age 0+ individuals in Lake Izunuma, Japan. The onset of the shift to piscivory occurred at a smaller size than in native or other non-native areas [> 40 mm total length (TL)]. We found a positive correlation between TL and delta C-13 throughout summer and autumn. Small individuals had delta C-13 values that were similar to those of zooplankton, whereas large individuals had delta C-13 values that were similar to those of cyprinid prey species. This suggests that the smaller 0+ individuals remain zooplanktivorous until late autumn, whereas the larger individuals shift to piscivory as early as June, soon after the breeding season ends. Our results also suggest that a significant number of 0+ bass failed to switch to piscivory until the winter of their first year, despite the smaller size threshold for the onset of piscivory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据