4.7 Article

Verticillium dahliae VdTHI4, involved in thiazole biosynthesis, stress response and DNA repair functions, is required for vascular disease induction in tomato

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 14-22

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.12.015

关键词

Verticillium; Thi4; Thiamine biosynthesis; UV tolerance; Plant pathogenicity

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) BioFung project
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG
  3. Cluster of Excellence and DFG Research Center Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vascular plant pathogen Verticillium dahliae colonizes the xylem fluid where only low nutrient concentrations are provided. Biosynthesis of the vitamin thiamine is connected to oxidative stress. The highly conserved VdThi4 protein is localized in fungal mitochondria and is required under vitamin B1 limiting conditions. Deletion of the corresponding VdTHI4 gene by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation resulted in strains which were impaired in growth on thiamine-free medium and could be rescued by additional vitamin supply or by complementation with the original gene after protoplastation. Furthermore, we show that VdThi4 increases fungal stress tolerance such as UV-damage or oxidative stress. The orthologous sti35 gene of Fusarium oxysporum, another vascular wilt fungus, was shown to be involved in stress response, however to be dispensable for pathogenicity on tomato. In contrast, VdTHI4 is required for fungal-induced tomato disease demonstrated by infection assays with a V. dahliae Delta VdTHI4 deletion strain which is still able to invade plants through the roots but is asymptomatic. Our results suggest remarkable differences between two vascular tomato pathogens where VdThi4 is required for pathogenicity of V. dahliae, whereas F. oxysporum still causes disease when the corresponding Sti35 protein is absent. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据