4.7 Article

Root hydraulic conductance, gas exchange and leaf water potential in seedlings of Pistacia lentiscus L. and Quercus suber L. grown under different fertilization and light regimes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 269-276

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.07.004

关键词

Drought; Gas exchange; Root hydraulic conductance; Fertilization; Light

资金

  1. XYLREFOR [GV 03/155]
  2. CONSOLIDER-INGENIO [GRACCIE CSD2007-00067]
  3. ESTRES [MARM, 063/SGTB/2007/7.1]
  4. CREOAK [QLRT-2001-01594]
  5. Generalitat Valenciana and Bancaixa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differences in morphology, biomass allocations and physiological responses were investigated in seedlings of Mastic tree (Pistacia lentiscus L.) and Cork oak (Quercus suber L.) submitted to contrasting fertilization and light regimes during early growth. These species are two evergreen sclerophyllous Mediterranean species frequently used in Mediterranean reforestation programmes. Fertilization was the treatment that affected most of the morphological and physiological variables evaluated in P. lentiscus and Q.suber seedlings. Leaf area and specific leaf area (SLA) were affected by shading treatment in both species, showing higher values in seedlings grown under shade. P. lentiscus seedlings showed a high capacity to modify root morphological variables and root hydraulic conductance (K-R) With the fertilization treatment. In contrast, Q. suber showed low to moderate root system changes with the treatments applied, although the fertilization level affected biomass allocation (i.e., root to shoot ratio) in both species. Under high water demand, P. lentiscus seedlings with high K-R allowed transpiration (E) to increase without increasing the water potential gradient between soil and leaves. In Q. suber, high fertilization induced significant increases in photosynthesis (A), as well as a tendency to increase E with significantly lower leaf water potential (psi(L)). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据