4.8 Article

Evaluation of the suitability of recombinant yeast-based estrogenicity assays as a pre-screening tool in environmental samples

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 361-367

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.02.004

关键词

Screening methods; Endocrine disruption; Bioassay; Wastewater

资金

  1. EU [SSPI-CT-2003-502492, GOCE 511237]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2007-64551/HID, CSD2009-00065, BIO2005-00840]
  3. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  4. Norwegian Research Council [162867]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a study evaluating the suitability of recombinant yeast-based estrogenicity assays as a pre-screening tool for monitoring of the chemical status of water bodies in support of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Three different recombinant yeast-based assays were evaluated; the Yeast Estrogen Screen (YES), the Recombinant Yeast Assay (RYA) and the Rikilt Estrogen bioAssay (REA), of which the YES assay was employed by two different laboratories. No significant difference between the performance of neither the different laboratories, nor the different yeast-assays was observed. Six batches of eleven samples each were analysed one week apart by the four participating laboratories and the robustness, repeatability and reproducibility of the participating yeast-based assays were evaluated. The setup included a correlation between bioassay results and results from chemical target analysis, which gave valuable information in the evaluation of the assays' performance. A good agreement was found between chemical and bioassay results, showing that the yeast-based assays can give valuable information in WFD work. However, the low sensitivity of the assays towards alkylphenols needs to be significantly improved if they are to be used for monitoring of these compounds. The study further led to suggestions on ways to improve traceability and quality assurance of the yeast-based assays. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据