4.8 Article

Predicting accurate and ecologically relevant regional scale concentrations of triclosan in rivers for use in higher-tier aquatic risk assessments

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 521-526

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.04.003

关键词

Triclosan; Ionisable; Exposure estimates; Monitoring

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010022, ceh010023, ceh010025] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triclosan (TCS) is used in a range of domestic products and may reach aquatic environments after disposal down-the-drain. Reach-specific TCS concentrations were predicted using the stochastic water quality model LF2000-WQX for two heavily urbanised regions in England, encompassing some of the most densely populated areas (including London and Birmingham). The model was calibrated using effluent TCS concentration data derived from a national monitoring programme which included 21 sewage treatment plants (STPs). The assessment represents a significant improvement on previous higher-tier modelling studies of TCS because it is applied to a much wider area compared with that hitherto evaluated. Initial results suggest that total TCS concentrations exceed a conservative Predicted No Effect Concentration of 69 ng L-1 in < 15% of river reaches. However, TCS is an ionisable compound with a pKa of about 8. In many rivers, a significant fraction of TCS will exist as the phenolate anion, which has much lower toxicity than neutral TCS. Concentrations of the neutral form of TCS were, therefore, calculated using measured data on river water pH. Predicted neutral concentrations in most river reaches were significantly lower than those for total TCS, often by > 50%, reducing the associated risks. Further work is needed to better characterise the aquatic toxicity of TCS to fresh water organisms under a range of environmentally relevant conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据