4.5 Article

Analysis of differentially expressed novel post-translational modifications of plasma apolipoprotein E in Taiwanese females with breast cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 252-262

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.05.038

关键词

Breast cancer; Plasma; Apolipoprotein E; Post-translational modification; Label-free relative quantification; Extracted ion chromatogram

资金

  1. Foundation of Chi Mei Medical Center in Taiwan [100CM-TMU-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

APOE epsilon 2 or epsilon 4 alleles being used as indicators of breast cancer risk are controversial in Taiwanese females. We provide a concept for relative comparisons of post-translational modifications (PTMs) of plasma apolipoprotein E (ApoE) between normal controls and breast cancer patients to investigate the association of ApoE with breast cancer risk. APOE polymorphisms (ApoE isoforms) were not assessed in this study. The relative modification ratio (%) of 15 targeted and 21 modified peptides were evaluated by 1D SDS-PAGE, in-gel digestion, and label-free nano-LC/MS to compare normal controls with breast cancer patients. Plasma levels of the ApoE protein did not significantly differ between normal controls and breast cancer patients. Eleven sites with novel PTMs were identified from 7 pairs of differentially expressed targeted and modified peptides according to the relative modification ratio including methylation at the E3 (up arrow 1.45-fold), E7 (up arrow 1.45-fold), E11 (up arrow 1.19-fold), E77 (up arrow 2.02-fold), E87 (up arrow 2.02-fold), and Q98 (up arrow 1.62-fold) residues; dimethylation at the Q187 (up arrow 1.44-fold) residue; dihydroxylation at the R92 (up arrow 1.25-fold), K95 (up arrow 1.25-fold), and R103 (up arrow 1.25-fold) residues; and glycosylation at the S129 (up arrow 1.14-fold) residue. The clustered methylation and dihydroxylation of plasma ApoE proteins may play a role in breast cancer. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据