4.7 Article

Stress based fracture envelope for damage plastic solids

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 419-438

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.11.010

关键词

Ductile fracture; Damage plasticity; Lode angle dependence; Pressure sensitivity; Maximum shear stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent development of damage plasticity theory shows the critical plastic strain at fracture for ductile solids depends on the pressure and the Lode angle on the octahedral plane along the loading path. The determination of the fracture strain envelope is usually a difficult and time consuming process. This is due to the experimental difficulties in maintaining a constant pressure and Lode angle at the fracture site, which is further complicated by the coupled nature of the parameters to be calibrated and the geometrical localization of the deformation. The fracture strain envelope is one of the key ingredients of the damage plasticity theory and relates to the accuracy of predicted results. In the present paper, the Lode angle dependence and the pressure sensitivity functions for the fracture strain envelope are derived from the hardening rule of the matrix using Tresca type fracture condition and Drucker-Prager formula, respectively. Quantitative analyses of Clausing's and Bridgman's test data are presented. Then a pressure modified maximum shear stress condition is adopted as fracture initiation condition to examine their joint effects on the fracture strain envelope. The relationship of the strain hardening, the pressure sensitivity and the Lode angle dependence are examined and verified by existing experimental results. We show that within the moderate range of stress triaxiality, the pressure modified maximum shear condition can be used as the fracture stress envelope for ductile metals within the framework of damage plasticity. The present method reduces significantly the amount of work to calibrate the material parameters for ductile fracture. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据