4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of constraint level on a crack path

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 83-92

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.11.011

关键词

Fracture mechanics; Constraint effect; Crack propagation; MTS criterion; Gear rim

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [106/09/1954]
  2. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [M100410901, RVO 68081723]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic Talented postdocs for scientific excellence in physics of materials [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0063]
  4. European Regional Development Fund [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of the work was to estimate the effect of a constraint on a predicted crack path and indicate cases where the failure of a component could be described more precisely by constraint-based description. Special specimen geometry with a high level of constraint was developed and numerical predictions of the crack path were compared with experimental results. The numerical model was built using commercial software ANSYS and a special procedure for the crack propagation was developed. The numerical prediction of the crack path based on a modified Maximum Tangential Stress (MTS) criterion (the criterion uses a two-parameter description of the stress field around the crack tip) is generally in agreement with the experimental data. The classical MTS criterion was found much more sensitive on the crack increment. Based on our numerical predictions it can be concluded that the modified MTS criterion predicted the crack path more precisely, especially in a case with high constraint level. This assumption is also demonstrated on the practical example of gear failure. A gear with a thin rim induces a relatively high level of constraint. It is shown that the influence of the constraint can significantly change the calculated crack path in specific cases. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据