4.7 Article

China's electric vehicle subsidy scheme: Rationale and impacts

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 722-732

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.022

关键词

Electric vehicle; Passenger vehicle; China; Subsidy; Ownership cost

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2010DFA72760, 2011DFA60650, 2011AA11A288, 2012DFA81190, Z121100007912001, 2013BAG06B02]
  2. China National Natural Science Foundation [71103109]
  3. China Automotive Energy Research Center (CAERC) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To promote the market penetration of electric vehicles (EV), China launched the Electric Vehicle Subsidy Scheme (EVSS) in Jan 2009, followed by an update in Sep 2013, which we named phase I and phase II EVSS, respectively. In this paper, we presented the rationale of China's two-phase EVSS and estimated their impacts on EV market penetration, with a focus on the ownership cost analysis of battery electric passenger vehicles (BEPV). Based on the ownership cost comparison of five defining BEPV models and their counterpart conventional passenger vehicle (CPV) models, we concluded that in the short term, especially before 2015, China's EVSS is very necessary for BEPVs to be cost competitive compared with CPVs. The transition from phase Ito phase II EVSS will generally reduce subsidy intensity, thus resulting in temporary rise of BEPV ownership cost. However, with the decrease of BEPV manufacturing cost, the ownership cost of BEPV is projected to decrease despite of the phase-out mechanism under phase II EVSS. In the mid term of around 2015-2020, BEPV could become less or not reliant on subsidy to maintain cost competitiveness. However, given the performance disadvantages of BEPV, especially the limited electric range, China's current EVSS is not sufficient for the BEPV market to take off. Technology improvement associated with battery cost reduction has to play an essential role in starting up China's BEPV market. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据