4.8 Article

High-efficiency, nickel-ceramic composite anode current collector for micro-tubular solid oxide fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 446-452

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.130

关键词

Anodic current collector; Micro-tubular SOFC; Contact loss; Co-extrusion/co-sintering

资金

  1. EPSRC in the United Kingdom [EP/G012679/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/E00136X/1, EP/G012679/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E00136X/1, EP/G012679/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High manufacturing cost and low-efficient current collection have been the two major bottlenecks that prevent micro-tubular SOFCs from large-scale application. In this work, a new nickel-based composite anode current collector has been developed for anode-supported MT-SOFC, addressing reduced cost, manufacturability and current collection efficiencies. Triple-layer hollow fibers have been successfully fabricated via a phase inversion-assisted co-extrusion process, during which a thin nickel-based inner layer was uniformly coated throughout the interior anode surface for improved adhesion with superior process economy. 10 wt.% CGO was added into the inner layer to prevent the excessive shrinkage of pure NiO, thus helping to achieve the co-sintering process. The electrochemical performance tests illustrate that samples with the thinnest anodic current collector (15% of the anode thickness) displayed the highest power density (1.07 W cm(-2)). The impedance analysis and theoretical calculations suggest that inserting the anodic current collector could dramatically reduce the percentage of contact loss down to 6 10 % of the total ohmic loss (compared to 70% as reported in literatures), which proves the high efficiencies of new current collector design. Moreover, the superior manufacturability and process economy suggest this composite current collector suitable for mass-scale production. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据