4.7 Article

Long-term changes in CO2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia-Identifying the drivers of environmental pressures

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 535-543

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.006

关键词

Carbon dioxide emissions; Decomposition analysis; Energy transition

资金

  1. Geographical systems and Risk Processes in the Context of Global Change and European Integration [MSM0021620831]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [P21012-G11, P20812-G11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents fossil-fuel related CO2 emissions in Austria and Czechoslovakia (current Czech Republic and Slovakia) for 1830-2000. The drivers of CO2 emissions are discussed by investigating the variables of the standard Kaya identity for 1920-2000 and conducting a comparative Index Decomposition Analysis. Proxy data on industrial production and household consumption are analysed to understand the role of the economic structure. CO2 emissions increased in both countries in the long run. Czechoslovakia was a stronger emitter of CO2 throughout the time period, but per-capita emissions significantly differed only after World War I, when Czechoslovakia and Austria became independent. The difference in CO2 emissions increased until the mid-1980s (the period of communism in Czechoslovakia), explained by the energy intensity and the composition effects, and higher industrial production in Czechoslovakia. Counterbalancing factors were the income effect and household consumption. After the Velvet revolution in 1990, Czechoslovak CO2 emissions decreased, and the energy composition effect (and industrial production) lost importance. Despite their different political and economic development, Austria and Czechoslovakia reached similar levels of per-capita CO2 emissions in the late 20th century. Neither Austrian eco-efficiency nor Czechoslovak restructuring have been effective in reducing CO2 emissions to a sustainable level. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据