4.7 Article

Nanoferrofluid addition enhances ammonia/water bubble absorption in an external magnetic field

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 268-277

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.032

关键词

Magnetic field; Nanoferrofluid; Ammonia/water; Bubble absorption; Enhancement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [50606027]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [10YZ100]
  3. Program for Shanghai Talent Development Fund [2010008]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [S30503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The absorber is one of the most critical components to consider in the improvement of absorption refrigeration cycle performance. In this work, we investigated the addition of an Fe3O4 nanoferrofluid in combination with the application of an external magnetic field as a new method for enhancing absorption in an ammonia/water bubble-type absorber and performed a detailed experimental study of its effects on bubble absorption. The results showed that the combined effect of the nanoferrofluid and the external magnetic field significantly enhanced ammonia/water bubble absorption, and the enhancement of the combined factors was greater than that by either factor alone under the same conditions. To obtain the greatest enhancement, we also determined the optimal concentration of nanoferrofluid within the investigated range and found that absorption was further enhanced with increasing magnetic field intensity at a constant nanoferrofluid concentration. At an initial ammonia mass concentration of 20%, an Fe3O4 nanoferrofluid mass concentration of 0.10% and an external magnetic field intensity of 280 mT, the effective absorption ratio reached a maximum of 1.0812 +/- 0.0001 under adiabatic condition. Finally, we discuss the mechanism of absorption enhancement by the nanoferrofluid and external magnetic field in this system. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据