4.7 Article

Glass-film-combination: Opto-physical properties and energy saving potential of a novel greenhouse glazing system

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 298-307

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.051

关键词

Thermal transfer coefficient; U-value; Heat loss; Energy efficiency; Heating energy consumption; Protected cultivation; Hot box; PAR; UV; Light transmission

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung) [FKZ 01LS05115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combination of anti-reflection coated glass and ethylene tetrafluoroethylene film is introduced as a novel glazing system for greenhouses and similar buildings. It combines the advantages of the individual materials (durability/low weight; favourable condensation behaviour/self-cleaning) and of single and double layer systems (light transmission/insulation). By inflating/deflating the glass-film interspace, the additional insulation can be switched on and off. Since no standard method for this purpose is available, a hot box-system was developed to measure heat transfer coefficients (U-values) of different models of the glass-film-combination (GFC) and other commonly used greenhouse glazing materials at different surface inclinations; with or without condensation. Surface inclination did not greatly influence heat transfer. Condensation increased the U-values more pronounced for single layer-systems than for the GFC. Influences of wind velocity on heat transfer decreased with the degree of insulation. Overall, when mounted with adhesive tape, the energy efficiency of the GFC was 38% higher compared to customary float glass. The energy saving potential of plastic profile mounted GFC versions was 50% and 64% for the double and triple layer system (ETFE-film on both sides of the glass pane), respectively. PAR transmission of the GFC was similar to single pane float glass, its UV transmittance markedly higher. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据