4.7 Article

Measurement and Prediction of Density for the Mixture of Athabasca Bitumen and Pentane at Temperatures up to 200 °C

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 2874-2885

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef4022784

关键词

-

资金

  1. SHARP consortium: Alberta Innovates Energy and Environment Solutions
  2. Athabasca Oil Sands
  3. Brion Energy
  4. Chevron Energy Technology Co.
  5. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.
  6. ConocoPhillips Canada
  7. Devon Canada Co
  8. Foundation CMG
  9. Husky Energy
  10. Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited
  11. Nexen Energy ULC
  12. Laricina Energy Ltd.
  13. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC-CRD)
  14. OSUM Oil Sands Co.
  15. PennWest Energy
  16. Statoil Canada Ltd.
  17. Suncor Energy
  18. Total EP Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main recovery mechanism in the solvent-based bitumen recovery processes is gravity drainage. The density of heated bitumen or diluted bitumen at operational conditions is required to predict the production rate and cumulative oil recovery. In this manuscript, the densities of bitumen, pentane, and their mixtures at different pentane weight fractions (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) have accurately been measured. The measurements were conducted under conditions applicable for both in situ recovery methods and pipeline transportation of heavy oil. The experiments were taken using Athabasca bitumen at temperatures varying from ambient up to 200 degrees C and at pressures up to 10 MPa. The volume change upon mixing for the mixtures is evaluated from the experimental results, and the influence of pressure, temperature, and solvent weight fraction on the volume change upon mixing and density is studied. The density data are also represented with three different approaches considering no volume change, excess volume, effective liquid densities, and equation of state. The results indicated that the mixture data are well-predicted using equation of state and effective liquid densities with average absolute relative deviations (AARD) of 0.55% and 0.57%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据